Have You Ever...

...Read a book, or an article or in my case, a judgment... several judgements, many...much infact, so much that after devoting so much concentration, sweat, toil and tears have you understood... nothing... from what you read?

Have you ever, tried so hard on focusing and directing all your psi on one point that, such is the concentrated force of your concentration the book infront of you catches fire?

I Have, but the latter results are flipped in my case...

I read so many cases and judgments from so many judges from books and sites alike and then realized, after a dumfounding 2 days, the books have infact been reading me...

...instead of the contrary.

for the second instance, i tried to focus so hard on what the judges are saying in their page long-winded decisions, sadly it was my head that caught fire and not the sodding books.

and i dont know why the fuck they have to be so accountable to the public. some things are so blatantly obvious that if i was the deciding judge in that particular case i wouldve convicted him/her on the spot, and worry about the severity of the judgement.

for example the case of Vallance [1960]. the dude got annoyed by some kids playing in a yard opposite his house that he fired an air-pressured rifle at them. the pellet or bullet, hit one of them -a 10 or 8 year old girl by the name of something Latham. the projectile punctured the flesh on a region around the left nipple, and fortunately for those people concerned about her health it was deflected by a rib-bone that if it had not; the bullet wouldve penetrated further into chest cavity...

the defendant, argued that he only INTENDED to scare them off and the wound was caused by the richocheting of the pellet.

if i was the judge...

"FUCKING BULLSHIT DUDE"
they are kids, they are MOVING targets so to say, if you were to fire something at them it would DEFINATELY hit someone, as they are KIDS, (kids always get shot) so it is the utter responsibility of the adult (defendant) to make sure no bullets fly in their direction in the 1st place! you can go shove your lame defense up your lame arse.

Forget about "intention" and what fucked up lame court-decision-accountability-to-the-sodding public crap.

"you shoot, you keel, you dai".

The man is guilty. case closed.

Other cases like Tranby, where it involved the defended biting off a significant chuck of the victim's ear off...

there was this on and fuckssake long debate on whether the wound or "grevious bodily harm" done needed to be accompanied by a "mental element".

Roy J said:
"fuck that, only dogs bite, humans dont. if you bite a fucker in the ear; you're a BIGGER fucker.
case closed. period."

The lamest one is Thornton, where up till today the case is still left hanging in the air... if i recall correctly they had 6 judges (yet how fucked up is to have an even number of judges, if it was me, i would be the sole judge and whatever i say is done and overwiith)

so the defendant got into an arguement at someones place, then left and went to his car, got out a sodding rifle and shot the air. 4 to 5 of the bullets entered a window into the house. when charged he said "i only wanted to fire over the house to make some noise"

you know what Justice Roy has to say to that?

"FUCK THAT SHIT"
Make some noise?! If i got this judgment wrong, i only wanted to make some noise at you. but this is what i hafta say

"you shoot, you scare, you dai". you wanna make some noise? sell that rifle and get yourself some pimpdaddy subwoofer trinkets you can load in your car boot, put on songs done by missy elliot or jay chou LOUDLY, THATS what i call "make some noise" bitch. Guns are used to shoot stuff, not make noise, get that straight nub.

case closed.